|
Post by cam on Feb 7, 2007 17:51:42 GMT -5
It must be a great feeling to get such good readings. When you did my reading we used seven letters but three works just as well? Millie...did you think about the letters or were they random.? I want to ask jay if it makes a difference.
|
|
|
Post by hiddenscars on Feb 7, 2007 17:56:19 GMT -5
I love it lol. I get loads of attention. lol
Well, the one with 7 does past, present, blah blah blah and so on... which I, personally, think is better for a full reading.
But mostly, online people do a 3 card one and just read those 3 cards, they don't stand for anything in particular, ie past or future.
All the person has to do is sit quitely and relaxed and give the first 3 letters that pop into their heads.
I don't know which one is better, cos I do them, I don't receive them.
|
|
|
Post by Millie on Feb 8, 2007 3:22:36 GMT -5
Cam - the first 3 that popped into my head were naturally A B C then I changed it to M N O to be less obvious. Nothing more to it than that.
|
|
|
Post by cam on Feb 8, 2007 8:26:25 GMT -5
Thanks jay..I understand it now.
Thanks millie. I was not sure if we had to think of the letters or just do whatever popped in .
|
|
|
Post by Millie on Feb 8, 2007 10:12:40 GMT -5
I don't know either
|
|
|
Post by hiddenscars on Feb 8, 2007 11:17:42 GMT -5
to be honest, it all comes down to whether you beleive it or not, or if you just do what you are supposed or whether you are simply taking the p**
|
|
|
Post by cam on Feb 8, 2007 14:33:36 GMT -5
You know I dont believe jay.
If only believers can have readings then how are sceptics supposed to find this proof that is supposed to be out there?
|
|
|
Post by hiddenscars on Feb 8, 2007 15:35:35 GMT -5
I wasn't talking about you... I didn't say only beleivers could have readings, godddd grrr!! lol. Maybe I didn't explain very well, as always... What I meant was, telling me abc, is just stupid. What I meant was, you have to have a little bit of faith in what you are doing, beleiver sceptic, whatever. Andddd.... I have forgotten. Ummm.... You just have to clear your mind, relax for a minute and give the first 3 letters that pop into your head. All I am saying is if everyone does that little bit properly, then its ok.
|
|
|
Post by cam on Feb 8, 2007 18:31:17 GMT -5
Sorry jay..I read it wrong. I get what you mean now.
|
|
|
Post by hiddenscars on Feb 8, 2007 18:36:10 GMT -5
I ain't bothered, I just can't explain anything properly, I know I can't.
|
|
|
Post by cam on Feb 8, 2007 18:42:29 GMT -5
Its sometimes hard to express things online.I am always reading things wrong.
|
|
|
Post by hiddenscars on Feb 8, 2007 18:50:42 GMT -5
Its always hard. Thats why I am in trouble all the time.
Its no big deal, I didn't explain properly.
|
|
|
Post by Millie on Feb 9, 2007 6:59:15 GMT -5
Jay - why is saying A B C stupid if those happen to be the first 3 letters that pop into your head? I don't see what is stupid about that
|
|
misty
Bump in the Night
Posts: 144
|
Post by misty on Feb 9, 2007 10:37:52 GMT -5
Good question Millie ........ and would the outcome with the cards have been different if you had stuck to your original thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by hiddenscars on Feb 9, 2007 11:00:13 GMT -5
If you sat down and cleared your mind and relaxed for a minute first then, no it isn't stupid at all. But any other way is a bit daft. Only because if you want a 'good' reading, it just helps to do that first essential bit first. Thats all. But if thats what you did, then it isn't stupid and I take it all back.
|
|
|
Post by pixi on Feb 14, 2007 7:48:42 GMT -5
I have to admit just thinking of letters to pop into my head was a bit difficult as they the first letter I thought of was J (OH first initial) so then I kinda just followed that theme and chose first letters for nearest and dearest.
|
|